What is the Islamic Ruling on the Issue of Waqfs?
Waqf means putting aside the original property and donating its
benefits for the sake of Allaah. What is meant by the original
property is something from which benefit may be derived whilst
its essence remains, such as houses, shops, gardens, etc. What
is meant by benefits is beneficial produce that comes from the
original property, such as crops, rents, provision of shelter,
etc.
The ruling
concerning waqfs is that the waqf is an act of worship which is
recommended in Islam (mustahabb). The evidence for that is the
saheeh Sunnah. In al-Saheehayn it is narrated that ‘Umar (may
Allaah be pleased with him) said: "O Messenger of Allaah, I have
got wealth from Khaybar and I have nothing that is more precious
to me than that. What do you command me to do with it?" He said,
"If you wish, you can put it aside and give in charity from it
(from what it produces), but the original property should not be
sold, given away or inherited." So ‘Umar gave it in charity to
the poor and to relatives, used it to set slaves free, gave it
for the sake of Allaah, helped wayfarers and honoured his
guests. Muslim narrated in his Saheeh that the Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "When the son of Adam
dies, all his good deeds come to an end except three: ongoing
charity, knowledge from which others may benefit after he is
gone, and a righteous son who will pray for him." Jaabir said:
"There was no one among the Companions of the Messenger of
Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) who had the
means, but he set up a waqf."
Qurtubah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: "There is no
dispute among the scholars concerning waqfs of aqueducts and
mosques in particular, but they differed concerning other types
of waqfs."
There is the condition that the one who established the waqf
should be one who has the authority to dispose of this wealth,
i.e., he should be an adult, free and mature, because a waqf
made by a minor, a fool or a slave is not valid.
The contract of the waqf is done in either of two ways:
a) By
saying something that indicates that a waqf is being
established, such as saying, "I make this place a waqf" or "I
make it a mosque."
b)
By doing something that customarily indicates a waqf, such as
making a house into a mosque, or giving general permission to
the people to pray there, or making one’s land into a graveyard
and giving people permission to bury their dead there.
Words which indicate a waqf are of two types:
1) Clear
words, such I saying "I make this a waqf," or "I make this for
the sake of Allaah," and so on… these words are clear, because
they cannot be interpreted as meaning anything other than a waqf.
When he utters these words it becomes a waqf with no need to add
anything further.
2)
Words which are indirect, such as "I give this in charity," or
"I deny myself its benefits" or "This is for the sake of Allaah
in perpetuity". These are called indirect because they may be
interpreted as meaning a waqf or something else. If he says an
expression such as this, it has to be accompanied by the
intention to set up a waqf, or one of the clear phrases, or one
of the other indirect phrases. The clear phrases include "I give
such and such in charity as a waqf, or for the sake of Allaah,
or denying myself its benefits, or in perpetuity." Or the
indirect words may be accompanied by the ruling on waqfs, such
as saying, "I give such and such in charity and it is not to be
sold or inherited."
Certain conditions apply in order for the waqf to be valid.
These include:
(1) That
the person who is setting up the waqf is one who has the
authority to dispose of this wealth, as stated above.
(2) That
the property given as a waqf should be something from which
ongoing benefit may be derived whilst its original essence
remains. Things which do not remain after they have been used
cannot be given as a waqf, such as food.
(3)
That the property given as a waqf should be something specific.
A waqf consisting of something unspecified is invalid, such as
saying, "I give one of my slaves or one of my houses as a waqf."
(4)
The waqf should be for a good purpose, because the purpose
behind it is to draw closer to Allaah – such as mosques,
aqueducts, waqfs for the poor, books of knowledge and waqfs to
benefit relatives. It is not permissible to set up a waqf for
purposes that are not good, such as waqfs for places of worship
of the kuffaar, or the books of the heretics, or for installing
lights on tombs or perfuming them with incense, or to support
those who look after tombs, because that is helping people to
commit sin, shirk and kufr.
(5) In
order for the waqf to be valid if it refers to a specific thing,
that thing should be in the firm possession of the one who is
setting up the waqf. So one who cannot possess anything, such as
the dead and animals, cannot set up a waqf.
(6) In
order for the waqf to be valid it must be executable with
immediate effect. A waqf which is temporary or suspended is not
valid, except when a person connects it to his death, such as
saying, "When I die, my house will be a waqf for the poor,"
because of what Abu Dawood narrated: "‘Umar made a will that if
anything were to happen to him, then Samagh – some land which he
owned – would be given in charity." This became well known and
no one denied this action, which amounted to unanimous agreement
on this point. The waqf which is connected to a person’s death
should be (no more than) one-third of the wealth, because it
comes under the rulings of wills (wasiyyah).
Among the rulings on waqfs is that it is obligatory to act in
accordance with the wishes of the one who set up the waqf, so
long as it does not go against sharee’ah, because the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "The Muslims
are bound by their conditions, except for conditions which make
haraam things permissible or halaal things forbidden." And
because ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) set up a waqf and
stipulated certain conditions, and if it had not been obligatory
to adhere to the conditions there would have been no point in
stipulating them. So if (the person setting up the waqf)
stipulates a certain amount, or that some deserving people
should be given precedence over others, or that those who are to
benefit should have certain qualities or be free of certain
qualities, etc., then it should be done in accordance with his
conditions, so long as that does not go against the Qur’aan or
Sunnah.
If he does not stipulate any conditions, then rich and poor,
male and female, should be treated equally when given the
benefits of the waqf.
If he does not designate a specific person to be in charge of
the waqf, or if he designates a specific person then that person
dies, then the one to look after the waqf should be the one for
whom it was set up. If the waqf was not set up to benefit a
particular person, such as a waqf set up for a mosque a mosque,
or for people who cannot be counted, such as the poor and needy,
then the ruler should take care of the waqf, either in person or
by delegating someone else to do it.
The person who takes care of the waqf has to fear Allaah and do
a good job in taking care of the waqf, because that is something
that has been entrusted to him (amaanah).
If a person sets up a waqf for his children, he must treat males
and females equally, because he has included all of them in
that, which implies that they all have an equal share. Just as
if he were to give something to them, it should be shared
equally among them, so too if he sets up a waqf for them, they
should have equal shares. After his own children, the waqf
should pass to the children of his sons, and not the children of
his daughters, because they belong to another man and should be
attributed to their father, because they are not included in the
aayah (interpretation of the meaning): "Allaah commands you as
regards your children’s (inheritance):" [al-Nisaa’ 4:11]. Some
of the scholars think that they (daughter’s children) are
included in the word "children", because the daughters are also
his children, so their (daughter’s) children are also his
children in a real sense. And Allaah knows best.
If he says "I set up a waqf for my sons, or for the sons of So
and so," then the waqf is for the males only, because the word
sons is used in the specific sense, as Allaah says
(interpretation of the meaning):
"Or has He (Allaah) only daughters and you have sons?" [al-Toor
52:39].
Unless those for whom the waqf is set up are a tribe, such as
Bani Haashim or Bani Tameem, in which case the women are also
included, because the name of the tribe includes both the males
and the females.
But if the waqf is set up for a group who can be counted, they
must all be included and treated equally. If they cannot all
benefit from it because they are so many, such as Bani Haashim
and Bani Tameem, then they do not all have to be included,
because it is impossible, and it is permitted to limit it to
some of them and give precedence to some of them over others.
Waqfs are among the contracts which become binding just by
speaking them, and it is not permissible to annul them, because
the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
"The original property should not be sold, given as a gift or
inherited." Al-Tirmidhi said: "According to the scholars, it is
not permissible to annul a waqf, based on this hadeeth and
because it is established in perpetuity and is not to be sold or
moved somewhere else unless its benefits cease altogether, such
as a house which gets destroyed and cannot be rebuilt using the
money of the waqf, or agricultural land which gets ruined and
becomes dead and cannot be restored, and there are no funds from
the waqf to restore it. In this case the waqf should be sold and
the money spent on a similar thing, because this is closer to
the aims of the waqf. If it is not possible to spend the money
on something that is exactly the same, then it is to be spent on
something smaller that is of the same nature, and the
replacement becomes a waqf as soon as it is bought.
If the waqf is a mosque and can no longer be used where it is,
such as if the neighbourhood in which it is located is
destroyed, then it should be sold and the money spent on another
mosque. If a waqf is set up to benefit a mosque and produces
more than is needed, it is permissible to spend the extra money
on another mosque, because in this way the benefit is given to
something similar to the purpose for which the waqf was set up.
It is permissible to give in charity to the poor the extra
benefits produced by a waqf that was set up to benefit a mosque.
If a waqf is set up for a specific person, such as saying, "This
is for Zayd; his is to be given one hundred of it every year,"
and it produces more than that, then the extra amount should be
given (in charity). Shaykh Taqiy al-Deen (may Allaah have mercy
on him) said: "If he knows that the produce will always be more,
then he has to dispose of it; withholding it is a waste of this
extra amount."
If a waqf is set up to benefit a mosque, and that mosque is
destroyed, and it is not possible to rebuild it from the waqf
funds, then they should be given to other mosques.
Source: al-Mulakhkhas al-Fiqhi by Shaykh Saalih ibn Fawzan Aal
Fawzaan, p. 158. (www.islam-qa.com)